Index | Thread | Search

From:
"Sebastian Reitenbach" <sebastia@l00-bugdead-prods.de>
Subject:
Re: fluidsynth update 2.3.4
To:
"Rafael Sadowski" <rafael@sizeofvoid.org>
Cc:
Solène Rapenne <solene@perso.pw>, "Thomas Frohwein" <tfrohwein@fastmail.com>, ports@openbsd.org
Date:
Sat, 20 Jan 2024 17:36:15 +0100

Download raw body.

Thread
On Saturday, January 20, 2024 10:37 CET, Rafael Sadowski <rafael@sizeofvoid.org> wrote:

> On Thu Jan 18, 2024 at 10:55:59PM +0100, Solène Rapenne wrote:
> > Le mercredi 17 janvier 2024 à 12:01 -0500, Thomas Frohwein a écrit :
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Following up on [1], I adjusted the fluidsynth diff to the latest
> > > version 2.3.4. Got interested in this when revisiting simutrans [2]
> > > which looks for fluidsynth>=2.1. I tested fluidsynth with shockolate
> > > and generaluser-gs-soundfont which works as previously. I assume from
> > > looking at the prior discussion that updating fluidsynth would require
> > > updating qsynth (see [3]).
> > > 
> > > One (minor?) issue is that the test binaries aren't built and so `make
> > > test` doesn't show any useful results. I looked a little through the
> > > cmake files and couldn't spot the problem, but that could probably be
> > > revisited later...?
> > > 
> > > ok to catch up our fluidsynth port?
> > > 
> > 
> > I don't have much opinion about the diff, but the ports using
> > audio/fluidsynth all build well with it
> 
> Double checked. OK to update fluidsynth!
> 

Only stumbled upon this threat right now. I'll see to get qsynth updated as well.

Sebastian