Johannes Thyssen Tishman:

> Subject says it all. I'm wondering if using the git conversion
> of the ports tree[0] is regarded as a good alternative to CVS for
> working with ports.

If you are more comfortable with Got[1] or Git, by all means use
them.  sthen@ has already explained the limits of the conversion.

> Do any of you porters use it instead of CVS?

I've mostly switched to Got for all of OpenBSD, and treat CVS as
write-only.  From the format of the patches flying around, it's
obvious that there are a number of committers that use Got or Git.

> [0] https://github.com/openbsd/ports

https://codeberg.org/OpenBSD/ports


[1] https://gameoftrees.org/

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          naddy@mips.inka.de