On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 11:00:07AM +0100, Tobias Heider wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 01:54:26AM +0000, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 02:48:32AM +0100, Tobias Heider wrote:
> > > I wouldn't mind enabling it for all archs either. Not sure which arch it
> > > doesn't work on so NOT_FOR_ARCHS doesn't seem very useful.
> > > I guess if it works on 32 bit BE macppc there is a good chance that most
> > > others work too.
> > 
> > Remove ONLY_FOR_ARCHS and find out through bulks?
> > Iff that's a bad idea or I'm missing something, your diff is certainly
> > OK kn, given your tests.
> 
> I think I'll do that then if no one sees a problem with it.
> Does updating archs need a REVISION bump? I guess I'd do one
> just to be sure.

It does not need a bupm. It does not change the package on architectures
where it built and where it didn't build, well, it didn't build.