Le Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 10:26:18AM +0000, Stuart Henderson a écrit :
> On 2024/02/09 10:14, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > Is the "remove qtwebkit" approach because it's causing an actual
> > problem, or is it just that it's old? Can we switch to qtwebengine where
> > possible but still keep qtwebkit for things where it's still needed
> > for certain software to work properly? Rendering local HTML files isn't
> > a particularly high security risk.
> > 
> > Regarding qgis, it seems they _can't_ use qtwebengine:
> > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/49512#issuecomment-1244676849
> 
> Aha - there is https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/53255 which has
> been merged into git master, so this requirement might go away soon.

yes, and https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/55627 starts paving the way
for qtwebengine - at some point qgis will switch to qt6 which doesnt
have qtwebkit, so qtwebengine support will have to come (as
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/54965 said, with things that might
not be possible yet...)

but i can readd the dep on qtwebkit if it's here to stay in the
portstree a little longer :)