El Tue, 13 Feb 2024 19:14:18 +0000
Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> escribió:
> I'd prefer to skip NO_BUILD unless it fails without - if a newer
> version starts doing something in that stage and you have NO_BUILD
> set and don't notice it'll end up running build stages in "make fake"
> 

That is a good observation, for now keeping NO_BUILD = Yes or removing
it does not prevent the correct creation of the package.

If at some point the package changes, then you would have to adapt it
to the new needs to build it. In any case, if I stay with the
maintenance I have to see and review that at the time when it is time
to make the corresponding updates.


-- 
*********************************************************
Dios en su cielo, todo bien en la Tierra