On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 02:57:39PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > From: Renato Aguiar <renato@renatoaguiar.net>
> > Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 17:31:41 -0800
> 
> Apologies to Antoine, I forgot to CC you the first time I sent this
> out.  Anyway, here is a new version.  Thinking about this a bit more
> changing CFI_STARTPROC like we did on arm64 will make maintenance a
> lot easier.  This will over-BTI, but I'm also looking at having the
> linker remove unnecessary ENDBR64 instructions at the start of a
> function.
> 
> ok?

I think this is preferable, especially if you are planning to amortize
the cost in lld.

ok tb