Jonathan Schleifer <js@nil.im> wrote:

> Fixed upstream:
> https://objfw.nil.im/info/262baf76e7e66bc4
> https://objfw.nil.im/info/d73a388ecaf73b2a
> 
> New release:
> https://objfw.nil.im/downloads/objfw-1.0.10.tar.gz
> https://objfw.nil.im/downloads/objfw-1.0.10.tar.gz.sig
> 
> Am 24.02.24 um 22:17 schrieb Mark Kettenis:
> 
> > Ah, right.  What happens in that case is that the branch will use
> > register X16 or X17 and those are special in the sense that both "bti
> > c" and "bti j" landing pads are ok.
> 
> Ah. Is that OpenBSD specific or on every OS? I used "bti jc" upstream
> now to be on the safe side. I think security-wise it shouldn't make
> much of a difference since it's still before the function prologue?

Today: OpenBSD.

In a few years, more and more software.

In a decade, all operating systems.