Download raw body.
[new] Nickel configuration language
Evan Silberman <evan@jklol.net> wrote: > Klemens Nanni <kn@openbsd.org> wrote: > > No idea about nickel, but port-wise this this looks fine and builds. > > > > Tests do not compile and thus don't run, though, is that a known issue? > > I think it's because dev/test dependencies are only in Cargo.toml in the > root of upstream's monorepo as workspace dependencies, e.g. for me just > now the test build failed due to an undeclared crate `tempfile`, which > is in the workspace dependencies but not declared as a dev-dependency by > nickel-lang-cli. Since we're building from the published crate artifact > and not a monorepo checkout we would have to resort to contrivances to > get any test dependencies in place and build the test. So, the issue is > known to us and probably is not a pressing issue for upstream. Seems > like an edge case as to whether NO_TEST=Yes is appropriate. > > Evan Bump, naddy's tapping his watch Evan
[new] Nickel configuration language