On 2024/03/13 19:36, Tobias Heider via ports wrote:
> 
> 
> On March 13, 2024 7:24:26 PM GMT+01:00, Stuart Henderson via ports <ports@openbsd.org> wrote:
> >On 2024/03/13 12:31, izder456 via ports wrote:
> >> Hey ports@-
> >> 
> >> Looks like these ports I take MAINTAINER on fail on sparc64 with the
> >> same u8string error, which AFAIK is a C++20 thing.
> >> 
> >> From what it looks like, sparc64 doesn't have a C++20 compiler, so they
> >> unfortunately will be broken on that arch.
> >> 
> >> Attached are diffs that adds BROKEN-sparc64 to those ports.
> >
> >I think something like this would be preferable
> >
> ># requires C++20
> >COMPILER = base-clang
> >
> 
> but then you could also add ports clang and ports gcc right?
> they should also support newer c++ versions

Could try it, but it seems fairly doubtful that they'll be good enough,
c++20 support in gcc 8 was pretty limited (and uses -std=c++2a not
-std=c++20), and ports-clang on base-gcc archs uses libestdc++ from
gcc 8. (gcc/11 is in the ports tree but can't be used in bulks unless
all c++ ports on whichever arch are switched from 8 to 11 otherwise
there will be build conflicts).