Le Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 07:38:35PM +0200, Rafael Sadowski a écrit :
> On Sun Apr 14, 2024 at 06:52:42PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > Le Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 07:25:49AM +0200, Rafael Sadowski a écrit :
> > > The same pattern like in the perverse qt6 flavor diffs. OK?
> > 
> > my understanding is that is needed for the huge devel/kf6 monster:
> > in devel/kf6/purpose: the following libraries in WANTLIB look like masked by RUN_DEPENDS: Qt6Core Qt6DBus Qt6Gui Qt6Network Qt6Qml Qt6Widgets Qt6Xml accounts-qt6 kaccounts6
> 
> Hmm, I think this is an issue on your side (My bulk was happy and my
> current local build is happy)

i have no idea about that, it was on a clean portstree with only your
devel/kf6 tarball.

> There are some more commits in nicolasfella libaccounts-qt6 repo so I
> bumped the libaccounts-qt (qt5) version.

what i meant was that this was not "the same code" so something else than
REVISION and SHARED_LIBS should be bumped, hence maybe pl0 :)

> > do the 3 consumers need adaptations or just build fine with this update ?
> > i don't remember if a REVISION bump is needed since you add a flavor, maybe the
> > pkgpath changes ?
> > 
> > x11/kde-applications/kio-gdrive
> > x11/kde-applications/akonadi
> > x11/kde-applications/kaccounts-integration
> 
> Yes they do. I don't know yet whether I'll do this before the
> kde6-big-bang commit. If so, I'll test it with the current tree and the
> ports.

if they build then ok with me, with pl0

Landry