Le Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 07:29:28AM +0200, Rafael Sadowski a écrit :
> Simple qt6 signond port. It was easier and cleaner to create a new port
> then to add qt6 flavor in the currert net/signond.
> 
> Upstream, it doesn't matter what package maintaienr has to fight.
> 
> OK to import? No conflicts at all.

i find it a bit ugly to patch all the .pro files to avoid building twice
all the signond bits which are built in net/signond... how ugly was it
to add a qt6 flavor to the latter ?

if you really insist on having another port, isn't it simpler to avoid
the patches, build everything and remove the conflicting/unwanted bits
in post-install or @comment them in PLIST ?

other than that, ok with me.