Index | Thread | Search

From:
Landry Breuil <landry@openbsd.org>
Subject:
Re: NEW: multimedia/phonon-qt6 and multimedia/phonon-backend/vlc-qt6
To:
Rafael Sadowski <rafael@sizeofvoid.org>
Cc:
Klemens Nanni <kn@openbsd.org>, Rafael Sadowski via ports <ports@openbsd.org>
Date:
Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:09:31 +0200

Download raw body.

Thread
Le Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 09:38:05AM +0200, Rafael Sadowski a écrit :
> On Mon Apr 15, 2024 at 12:07:34PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > Le Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 07:33:15AM +0200, Rafael Sadowski a écrit :
> > > On Sat Apr 06, 2024 at 02:36:43PM +0000, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > > > 14.03.2024 23:42, Rafael Sadowski via ports пишет:
> > > > > I would like to import multimedia/phonon-backend/vlc-qt6
> > > > > multimedia/phonon-qt6. Please find tarball attached. This import does
> > > > > not create any conflicts but it needs a simple adjustment
> > > > 
> > > > Why those LIB_DEPENDS those?
> > > > No REVISION bumps?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Nothing changes: I moved LIB_DEPENDS as it is from Makefile.inc to the
> > > Makefile's. This change is necessary to import
> > > multimedia/phonon-backend/vlc-qt6 otherwise
> > > multimedia/phonon-backend/vlc-qt6 depends on "multimedia/phonon>=4.12.0"
> > > which is qt5.
> > 
> > that part is fine. I looked at the two ports, and it's still a bit sad
> > to have 'new ports with a -qt6 suffix' from the same tarball building
> > twice, once with qt5 and once with qt6, while it could only be built
> > once with the two qt5/qt6 backends and shipped as subpackages.. that
> > would be cleaner. Will that be only transitional, or both will coexist
> > for years ?
> > 
> > anybody else having a strong opinion on that subject ?
> 
> 
> New flavor approach. I'm happy with this one and I want to push it into
> a bulk build.

oh, i really really like that :)