On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 06:50:43PM +0100, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> On Fri, 31 May 2024 17:18:40 +0100,
> Theo Buehler <tb@theobuehler.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 06:37:26PM +0100, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> > > ports@,
> > > 
> > > Here an update for docker-compose to the last version which was released a
> > > few hours ago.
> > > 
> > > The good news that this release includes our patches that allows to drop it
> > > from ports tree.
> > > 
> > > The only patch that left was also merged to upstream of buildkit and the
> > > next release of buildkit will include that.
> > > 
> > > After that this port can be rewritten to usual go port and vendor artifact
> > > can be avoided.
> > > 
> > > Thus, it is future, but todays diff which was tested on -current/amd64 here:
> > 
> > 
> > This doesn't build here:
> > 
> > # github.com/docker/compose/v2/vendor/github.com/tonistiigi/fsutil
> > vendor/github.com/tonistiigi/fsutil/hardlinks.go:83:67: undefined: syscall.EBADMSG
> > 
> > Did the commit miss a patch or did you build this with the related
> > patches for lang/go that you sent to the list recently?
> 
> Indeed I do have updated lang/go with patches which I sent recently to
> remove patches which enforce value of syscall.EBADMSG.
> 
> Well, I've reinstalled lang/go to have reproduce the failure, and here the
> diff which should fix the build. I've re-checked docker-cli, docker-buildx
> and docker-compose.

Thanks. Committed the diff.

> So, this diff required until lang/go is updated. I think that move with
> patch for lang/go is the rigth move, but anyway, here the fix:

Maybe, but until jsing has decided to land that one, we need to patch
the ports.