On 24-06-07 15:34:38, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Jun 2024 12:11:44 +0100,
> Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On 2024/06/07 01:04, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> > > I also included trivial patches to add missed syscall.EBADMSG on 386, amd64
> > > and arm which allows to remove dozen of patches from port tree.
> > 
> > slight exaggeration... 7 patches in docker-compose and 7 in
> > docker-buildx, all because of github.com/tonistiigi/fsutil.
> >
> 
> just a bit, but it it still dozen of patches.
> 
> > afaik they're meant to be getting these from golang.org/x/sys/unix
> > (where EBADMSG *is* present for all OpenBSD platforms) rather than
> > go itself anyway?
> 
> I've already tried it and discovered an issue that x/sys/unix isn't
> available on windows that is expected, but syscall.EBADMSG is available on
> windows. My approach to replace it in fsutil fails on CI [1].

syscall.EBADMSG is one of the few cases where it still makes sense
to use the syscall package (since it is - or should be - abstracted
and available for all GOOS/GOARCH).