On 2024/07/15 23:07, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 10:38:34PM +0200, Volker Schlecht wrote:
> > > On 2024/07/15 21:29, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> > > > Slightly offtopic, but do we still need ghostscripts a4 and no_x11
> > > > FLAVORS?
> > 
> > Moving this to a new thread. I'll look into including the rest of ghostpdl
> > next.
> > 
> > I'd be very happy to drop -no_x11 and -a4.
> > 
> > ok?
> 
> This needs some @pkgpath markers in pkg/PLIST to allow seamless
> updates. Something like
> 
> @pkgpath print/ghostscript/gnu,a4
> @pkgpath print/ghostscript/gnu,no_x11
> @pkgpath print/ghostscript/gnu,a4,no_x11

Yes.

> I'm not sure about how to deal with the remaining gtk flavor. Maybe to
> add the following lines to pkg/PFRAG.gtk?
> 
> @pkgpath print/ghostscript/gnu,a4,gtk

That one makes sense,

> @pkgpath print/ghostscript/gnu,no_x11,gtk
> @pkgpath print/ghostscript/gnu,a4,no_x11,gtk

those aren't needed, the combination of no_x11 and gtk was rejected
in the Makefile so people won't have them installed.

> And I'm even more unsure about wether (and what) @conflict markers
> are needed.

Not needed.