Index | Thread | Search

From:
Omar Polo <op@omarpolo.com>
Subject:
Re: [new] multimedia/mat2
To:
Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org>
Cc:
Jag Talon <jag@aangat.lahat.computer>, ports@openbsd.org
Date:
Thu, 18 Jul 2024 16:29:46 +0200

Download raw body.

Thread
On 2024/07/18 13:04:40 +0100, Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> wrote:
> On 2024/07/18 13:00, Omar Polo wrote:
> > On 2024/07/17 09:51:49 -0400, Jag Talon <jag@aangat.lahat.computer> wrote:
> > > Ping! Does this look ok to everyone?
> > 
> > with RUN_DEPENDS sorted and a tiny formatting change to DESCR it's OK
> > op@ to import.
> > 
> > Just a curiosity, why don't call it mat2 instead of py3-mat2?  I
> > understand that it also provides a library, but I guess the main
> > entrypoint is the binary bin/mat2 and so the package could be called
> > like that?
> 
> If the main use is standalone, then that probably makes sense.
> 
> >  DISTNAME =		mat2-${MODPY_EGG_VERSION}
> > -PKGNAME =		py-${DISTNAME}
> >  
> >  CATEGORIES =		multimedia
> >  
> > @@ -20,14 +19,14 @@
> >  FLAVORS =		python3
> >  FLAVOR =		python3
> 
> If it doesn't have a py- prefix then please don't use FLAVOR=python3

of course, sorry for missing it.  Here's a new tarball with the packaged
called "mat2" and without FLAVORS.  If it's really used as a library too
(honsetly I haven't checked) then I'm also fine with readding the prefix
and FLAVORS.

(it's obviously ok op@ to import with or without the FLAVOR/py-prefix)