Index | Thread | Search

From:
Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda <acamari@verlet.org>
Subject:
Re: [NEW] net/b2
To:
Paul Galbraith <paul@galbraiths.ca>, A Tammy <openbsd.ports@aisha.cc>, ports@openbsd.org
Date:
Mon, 29 Jul 2024 14:21:22 -0600

Download raw body.

Thread
  • Paul Galbraith:

    [NEW] net/b2

    • Kirill A. Korinsky:

      [NEW] net/b2

      • Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda:

        [NEW] net/b2

On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 5:22 PM Kirill A. Korinsky <kirill@korins.ky> wrote:

> diff --git sysutils/b2/pkg/PLIST sysutils/b2/pkg/PLIST
> index e910ea53f53..5bd3b06e2fe 100644
> --- sysutils/b2/pkg/PLIST
> +++ sysutils/b2/pkg/PLIST
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> +@conflict boost-*
>  bin/b2
>  bin/b2v3
>  bin/b2v4
>
> and, finally, added a conflict with boost. Both port contains
> /usr/local/bin/b2 but such conflict makes installing it quite tricky
> because
> a bit less than 200 ports depends on devel/boost.
>
>
I'd be OK if we rename b2 in this port to something else...

In debian they seem to rename the binary b2 -> backblaze-b2, according to:

https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/all/backblaze-b2/filelist

So, maybe a lot of people don't depend on that name on their scripts...

Thoughts?