On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 8:27 AM Paul Galbraith <paul@galbraiths.ca> wrote:

> On 2024-09-08 9:23 p.m., A Tammy wrote:
> > On 9/8/24 8:06 PM, Paul Galbraith wrote:
> >> On 2024-09-03 12:36 p.m., Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 03 Sep 2024 14:40:52 +0200,
> >>> Paul Galbraith <paul@galbraiths.ca> wrote:
> >>>> On 2024-09-02 6:17 p.m., Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, 02 Sep 2024 22:58:25 +0200,
> >>>>> Paul Galbraith <paul@galbraiths.ca> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 2024-08-04 6:19 a.m., Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> >>>>>>> I haven't tested it, just make a quick read. Plan to test in soon.
> >>>>>> Any luck?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> Sorry, I forgot about that.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Just tested and it works.
> >>>>>
> >>>> Thanks for confirming, are you Ok with the naming?  I think it makes
> >>>> sense to consistently rename all the executables, and leave it to the
> >>>> user to create symlinks to preserve functionality for existing scripts
> >>>> that are using the original b2 names.
> >>>>
> >>> This makes sense.
> >>>
> >> Updated with a message explaining the rename of b2 -> backblaze-b2.
> >> OK to add now?
> >>
> > basic operations are working for me, OK aisha
> >
> Can this be committed now?
>

afaik, ports in freezed right now. this will need to wait for next release
cycle