On 2024/11/07 08:56, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I think it would be better not to kill this port on base-gcc arches.
> Perhaps make building pzstd conditional?
> 
> I'd also worry about an archiver that pulls in ports-gcc causing a
> dependency loop on ports-gcc archs (seems ok now, but perhaps sometime
> in the future).

Also, multithreaded support was added to zstd itself (-T(number of
cores), or -T0 to autodetect), pzstd has not been recommended for some
time now:

https://github.com/facebook/zstd/issues/407#issuecomment-299952807