Index | Thread | Search

From:
Paul Galbraith <paul@galbraiths.ca>
Subject:
Re: [NEW] net/b2
To:
ports@openbsd.org
Date:
Fri, 8 Nov 2024 19:37:43 -0500

Download raw body.

Thread
On 2024-10-24 4:26 p.m., Paul Galbraith wrote:
> On 2024-10-23 3:33 a.m., Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> Thanks. Couple of small things:
>>
>> - it's unfortunate about the name conflict, but it's unavoidable for
>> "b2". I'd prefer not to rename b2v3/b2v4 though. For one thing, upstream
>> recommends using a numbered version in scripts ("for long-term support,
>> i.e. in scripts, use b2v4 command"). For another it will remove some 
>> text
>> from MESSAGE which should be as short as possible - we find people tend
>> to ignore larger chunks of text at the end of pkg_add so best keep it
>> short and to the point. I think users can be expected to figure out
>> symlinks or shell aliases themselves too, so I'd go with just this for
>> MESSAGE:
>>
>> The b2 CLI utility has been renamed to backblaze-b2 to avoid a conflict
>> with the Boost b2 utility.
>>
>> - the idna dependency is listed upstream with
>> "idna~=3.4; platform_system == 'Java'" and doesn't seem to
>> be used in the code; is that actually needed?
>>
>> With the first of those changes, and the secomnd if appropriate, it's
>> ok sthen.
>
> Thanks for taking a look, Stuart.  I've made these changes and also 
> bumped the version to the latest release.
>
Can anyone spare a few minutes to import?  TIA,

Paul