On Fri Mar 7, 2025 at 12:27 AM CET, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2025/03/06 19:48, Philip Kaludercic wrote:
> > Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> writes:
> > 
> > > On 2024/07/31 16:32, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > >> Ok with you, Hukadan?
> > >> 
> > >> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=172226686214725&w=2
> > >
> > > tb@ pointed out that this breaks with go-1.23rc2:
> > >
> > > # github.com/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/cmd/gotosocial
> > > link: codeberg.org/gruf/go-fastcopy: invalid reference to io.errInvalidWrite
> > >
> > > This can be worked around with the following snippet:
> > >
> > > # disable https://go.dev/doc/go1.23#linker to unbreak with go-1.23rc2.
> > > # remove either if codeberg.org/gruf/go-fastcopy is fixed, or "existing
> > > # usages of //go:linkname found in a large open-source code corpus
> > > # remain supported" is extended.
> > > MODGO_LDFLAGS += -checklinkname=0
> > >
> > > That part can't be committed before go-1.23, and I doubt it would be
> > > needed for long, gotosocial is actively developed.
> > 
> > Sorry to ping this thread again, but I don't remember what the result
> > was and there has since been an apparently important security release
> > https://github.com/superseriousbusiness/gotosocial/releases/tag/v0.17.4
> > that might be nice to have in ports before the next release of OpenBSD?
>
> If I understand correctly GTS doesn't run properly on OS without coherent
> file + mmap access (i.e. unified buffer cache) any more, so we should
> probably delete the port..

Hi,

@Philip, following this thread, I provided a diff a while ago (at that time to
update to 0.17.1).

I do not use this port anymore. I don't feel confident in being able to maintain
it, especially without being able to test it properly.

@Stuart, I agree, I have no objection on my side.

Regards,

Hukadan