> I didn't look much at the openrdap.org client before (go is a bit
> of a turn-off ports-wise), but now I've tried it, actually I like it the
> best of the three - cleaner output than both rdapper/icann-rdap, under
> a minute to build, and doesn't pull in 80+ p5-* deps. I'll attach a
> first cut at a port for that too.

It definitely is the one I like best, too. Although it only adds two
mostly dead archs to the ones icann-rdap supports :)

I have no real opinion on the naming of ports and binaries but I'm ok
with importing this go port with whichever consensus emerges.

> +# ring-v0.17.8 does not support this arch
> +NOT_FOR_ARCHS =	sparc64

I think we should not mention the patch version in these comments.
ring v0.17 won't grow sparc64 support.