Le Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 08:31:28AM +0200, Renaud Allard a écrit :
> 
> 
> On 4/5/25 6:30 PM, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > hi,
> > 
> > while working on an update to py-rio-cogeo, runtime testing blowed
> > strangely:
> > 
> > geo/py-rasterio/ $rio cogeo --help
> > 
> > Warning: entry point could not be loaded. Contact its author for help.
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> >    File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/click_plugins/core.py", line 37, in decorator
> >      group.add_command(entry_point.load())
> >                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >    File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 2775, in load
> >      self.require(*args, **kwargs)  # type: ignore[arg-type]
> >      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >    File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 2803, in require
> >      items = working_set.resolve(reqs, env, installer, extras=self.extras)
> >              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >    File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 892, in resolve
> >      dist = self._resolve_dist(
> >             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >    File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pkg_resources/__init__.py", line 938, in _resolve_dist
> >      raise VersionConflict(dist, req).with_context(dependent_req)
> > pkg_resources.ContextualVersionConflict: (pydantic-core 2.27.0 (/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages), Requirement.parse('pydantic-core==2.23.4'), {'pydantic'})
> > 
> > digging further i found the 'hard' requirement here:
> > /usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pydantic-2.9.2.dist-info/METADATA:Requires-Dist: pydantic-core==2.23.4
> > 
> > seems upstream sets hard requirements between both modules, and recently started enforcing it even more:
> > https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic/commit/ea3f18dea95e253d300c0a90095bb7005b1da90b
> > 
> > something to fix/comment in the port for forthcoming updates, but for release
> > maybe this is ok ?  it fixes 'rio cogeo' here at least, and i dunno what other
> > ports having an RDEP on pydantic might be affected by that.
> > 
> 
> That should be OK given we didn't change anything else, so it should not
> affect other ports if they were already working.

given that only pygeoapi and synapse use pydantic in -current (what i
saw was in a wip update for rio-cogeo, adding pydantic as a dep), we'll
keep what we have for now.

but post-unlock, both pydantic & pydantic-core need to be updated to
versions that match the upstream version requirement (with comments in
both ports to remind ppl to update them in one go)

Landry