Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> writes:

> On 2025/04/26 18:17, Paco Esteban wrote:
>> 
>> > Miniflux is now at 2.2.8 so you may disregard the diff for 2.2.7:
>> >
>> > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=174413340513859&w=2
>> >
>> > However, my notes from the aforementioned email still apply. Diff below
>> > tested on amd64 VM.
>> 
>> Your patch does not apply as it's QP encoded and lines mangled, so I did not
>> test it.  Please send it in plain text without encoding.
>
> it is only QP encoded, the lines aren't mangled, it applies problem
> free when spplied from a mua that decodes (with mutt, v then |, if your
> usual mua won't do it then there's qprint).
>
> I'll include the untouched patch below.

Did not know about qprint.  Thanks for that.
In the process, I ended up discovering another method of dealing with the patch.
So I can choose now :-)

>> In any case, I don't really see the point on having the whole sales pitch of the
>> software on DESCR.
>
> agreed. that is way too much text. ideally best if pkg_info $packagename
> leaces all important information on screen in an 80x24 terminal, though
> could maybe go slightly more if that misses sonething inportant.

I don't think a list of features is that informative, so I ended up removing it
and putting a reference to their fetures web page.

Cheers,
Paco.