Ping. Can I get a second ok to remove benchmarks/tsung?

On 6/2/25 6:05 PM, Volker Schlecht wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback! With that I would like to propose the following:
> 
> Unless anyone speaks up in the next 2 weeks, I propose to delete 
> benchmarks/tsung.
> In case anyone still wants to keep the port, I'll apply my originally 
> proposed
> patches.
> 
> On 2025-06-01 22:48, Greg Steuck wrote:
>> Volker Schlecht <openbsd-ports@schlecht.dev> writes:
>>
>>> benchmarks/tsung currently suffers from a number of compilation
>>> and runtime errors when compiling/running on OTP versions > 25
>>>
>>> All that is needed to fix that, has been documented in a number
>>> of issues, and pull requests, but it appears that there isn't a
>>> lot of drive left in the project (and possibly its user base)
>>> anymore.
>>>
>>> I've applied the already proposed changes and filled the gaps
>>> with a few patches of my own, and the result passes tests (save
>>> one test, which has always been failing on OpenBSD).
>>>
>>> While at first glance it appears the some of the patches disable
>>> SSL verification, those are just reinstating the behavior that
>>> tsung always had: Erlang changed the default behavior for SSL
>>> connections from not-verifying to verifying, and tsung leans on the
>>> old default.
>>>
>>> Not nice, but also nothing new ... changing it without breaking
>>> existing setups is beyond the length I want to invest in this
>>> port :-)
>>>
>>> With these changes, we could move tsung to use MODERL_DEFAULT_VERSION
>>> and get rid of erlang/25 and erlang/26 eventually.
>>>
>>> Thoughts? Opinions?
>>
>> I'm OK with you pushing this into our tree as you still did the work.
>> I'm also OK with deleting this port entirely.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Greg
>>
>