Index | Thread | Search

From:
Tom Smyth <tom.smyth@wirelessconnect.eu>
Subject:
Re: nsh needs to adapt to mbuf.h changes
To:
Tom Smyth <tom.smyth@wirelessconnect.eu>, Stefan Sperling <stsp@stsp.name>
Cc:
ports <ports@openbsd.org>
Date:
Mon, 21 Jul 2025 18:06:10 +0100

Download raw body.

Thread
Stuart, all,
Sorry for missing this, and not replying sooner,


It might be worth doing a release for those running stable, and then
adding in the fix with an ifdef
Ill have a chat with Stefan, offline,

On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 at 01:14, Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> wrote:
>
> quick heads-up, this change in base needs nsh to catch up. I didn't
> check but I assume the existing code is going to be similar enough to
> what's in usr.bin/netstat/mbuf.c that it should be easy to adapt.
>
>
> ----- Forwarded message from Alexander Bluhm <bluhm@openbsd.org> -----
>
> From: Alexander Bluhm <bluhm@openbsd.org>
> Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 05:34:40 -0600 (MDT)
> To: source-changes@cvs.openbsd.org
> Subject: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: src
>
> CVSROOT:        /cvs
> Module name:    src
> Changes by:     bluhm@cvs.openbsd.org   2025/06/22 05:34:40
>
> Modified files:
>         sys/kern       : kern_sysctl.c uipc_mbuf.c uipc_mbuf2.c
>         sys/sys        : mbuf.h
>         usr.bin/netstat: mbuf.c
>
> Log message:
> Protect mbuf statistics counter with splnet.
>
> MP safe conters with per CPU memory still need spl protection when
> called from interrupt context.  Some increments of mbuf counters
> had that, others did not.  Introduce inline function mbstat_inc()
> and enum counter types for mbufs, like we have elsewhere.  With
> that mbufs counter increment takes splnet() everywhere.
>
> OK mvs@ dlg@
>
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----



-- 
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.