Index | Thread | Search

From:
Matthieu Herrb <matthieu@openbsd.org>
Subject:
Re: wayland/wlroots : introduce mod_wlroots
To:
Rafael Sadowski <rafael@sizeofvoid.org>
Cc:
ports@openbsd.org
Date:
Tue, 5 Aug 2025 08:09:30 +0200

Download raw body.

Thread
  • Rafael Sadowski:

    wayland/wlroots : introduce mod_wlroots

    • Matthieu Herrb:

      wayland/wlroots : introduce mod_wlroots

  • yaydn@protonmail.com:

    wayland/wlroots : introduce mod_wlroots

  • On Mon, Aug 04, 2025 at 11:49:30AM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
    > On Mon Aug 04, 2025 at 10:55:10AM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
    > > Hi,
    > > 
    > > Since wlroots upstreams has decided to include the library version
    > > number in  its name, managing dependencies on wlroots over updates
    > > (and 0.19.0 is ready) has become a bit annoying.
    > > 
    > > The diff below intruduces a wlroots module and uses it in the current
    > > ports depending on wlroots.
    > > 
    > > Comments? Ok?
    > 
    > Would it make sense to start a wayland module that contains
    > MODWL_USE_ROOTS = Yes|No. I think all wayland ports requires
    > wayland-protocols at build time?
    > 
    > Or is that thinking too big?
    
    I think it's not needed. I hate when ports modules do too much magic
    things. It makes figuring out issues more complex.
    
    -- 
    Matthieu Herrb
    
    
  • Rafael Sadowski:

    wayland/wlroots : introduce mod_wlroots

  • yaydn@protonmail.com:

    wayland/wlroots : introduce mod_wlroots