On Tue, 05 Aug 2025 14:00:54 +0200,
Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> wrote:
> 
> with i386, after syncing the arch-specific USE_LLD parts from the recent
> update in 8/11, I get quite a few of these during build, though it gets
> past that stage.
> 
> /usr/bin/ld.bfd: Dwarf Error: found dwarf version '5', this reader only handles version 2 information.
>

I think that we can ignore it because it related only for debug information

> eventually fails here:
> 
> checking for cabs... /pobj/gcc-15.1.0/build-i386/./gcc/xgcc -B/pobj/gcc-15.1.0/build-i386/./gcc/ -B/usr/local/i386-unknown-openbsd/bin/ -B/usr/local/i386-unknown-openbsd/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/i386-unknown-openbsd/include -isystem /usr/local/i386-unknown-openbsd/sys-include   -fno-checking -c -g -O2  -fpic -fno-lto  -W -Wall -gnatpg -nostdinc   g-sothco.adb -o g-sothco.o
> /pobj/gcc-15.1.0/build-i386/./gcc/xgcc -B/pobj/gcc-15.1.0/build-i386/./gcc/ -B/usr/local/i386-unknown-openbsd/bin/ -B/usr/local/i386-unknown-openbsd/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/i386-unknown-openbsd/include -isystem /usr/local/i386-unknown-openbsd/sys-include   -fno-checking -c -g -O2  -fpic -fno-lto  -W -Wall -gnatpg -nostdinc   g-socpol.adb -o g-socpol.o
> yes
> checking for cabsl... /pobj/gcc-15.1.0/build-i386/./gcc/xgcc -B/pobj/gcc-15.1.0/build-i386/./gcc/ -B/usr/local/i386-unknown-openbsd/bin/ -B/usr/local/i386-unknown-openbsd/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/i386-unknown-openbsd/include -isystem /usr/local/i386-unknown-openbsd/sys-include   -fno-checking -c -g -O2  -fpic -fno-lto  -W -Wall -gnatpg -nostdinc   g-spogwa.adb -o g-spogwa.o
> g-socket.adb:2882:26: error: value not in range of type "time_t" defined at g-sothco.ads:47
> g-socket.adb:2882:26: error: static expression fails Constraint_Check
> g-socket.adb:2884:26: error: value not in range of type "time_t" defined at g-sothco.ads:47
> g-socket.adb:2884:26: error: static expression fails Constraint_Check
> yes
> checking for floorf... gmake[7]: *** [../gcc-interface/Makefile:294: g-socket.o] Error 1
> gmake[7]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> yes
> checking for floor... yes
> 
> full log attached

And this one rings a bell. Because when I updated patches I had touched
things related to some time_t in ADA.

Thanks, will digg into it.

-- 
wbr, Kirill