On Sat, Sep 20, 2025 at 12:52:25PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:

> On 2025/09/20 13:02, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > Le Sat, Sep 20, 2025 at 12:22:19PM +0200, Marcus Glocker a ?crit :
> > > On Sat, Sep 20, 2025 at 09:08:09AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Le Sat, Sep 20, 2025 at 06:48:57AM +0200, Marcus Glocker a ?crit :
> > > > > Should we take a stab to clean this up?
> > > > 
> > > > i'm not opposed to it at all, but i dont see a real reason to drop it,
> > > > x11/xfce4 and x11/gnome do exist as proper CATEGORIES....
> > > 
> > > Yeah, while x11/windowmaker doesn't seem to be defined as a category
> > > anywhere.  I guess that's why rsadowski@ was mentioning that it's not
> > > a valid category.
> > 
> > from my understanding, a category is defined as soon as a port declares
> > it... like x11/xfce4 and x11/gnome, which arent 'tied' to a subdir, eg
> > ports outside of those subdirs can declare themselves in that category..
> > like wm dockapps do ?
> > 
> 
> exactly
> 
> removing this loses useful information, imo.

Got it.  Then lets keep it, and I'll add it back to sysutils/wmtempmon.