Index | Thread | Search

From:
Kirill A. Korinsky <kirill@korins.ky>
Subject:
Re: graphics/ffmpeg: update to 8.0
To:
rafael@sizeofvoid.org, ports@openbsd.org, andrey0bolkonsky@gmail.com, tobhe@openbsd.org, thfr@openbsd.org, uaa@openbsd.org, rsadowski@openbsd.org, pascal@stumpf.co, espie@openbsd.org, landry@openbsd.org, kn@openbsd.org, kirby@openbsd.org, jeremy@openbsd.org, brad@comstyle.com, noiseless-ak@yandex.ru
Date:
Sun, 19 Oct 2025 13:33:37 +0200

Download raw body.

Thread
On Mon, 22 Sep 2025 21:58:55 +0200,
Kirill A. Korinsky <kirill@korins.ky> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 14:12:34 +0200,
> Rafael Sadowski <rafael@sizeofvoid.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Sat Sep 20, 2025 at 12:55:44PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > IMO it is worth committing diffs to preemptively fix ports with
> > > newer FFmpeg before the update, as long as they don't break with
> > > the old version - I only skimmed the diff but it looked like
> > > these are generally safe from a quick look.
> > > 
> > > (also if there is a choice between fixing by adding a patch, and
> > > fixing by updating the relevant port, updating would generally be
> > > preferred)
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes, that worked really well last time. I would be in favour of
> > committing these changes only after building with -current and
> > then having a small diff to test it.
> > 
> 
> Thanks for feedback. It was original design of patches but at some point I
> realized that moving with one large patch is simpler way to manage it.
> 
> Neverless, I had split it into 3 parts:
>  - ffmpeg8.diff contains an updated for ffmpeg only
>  - ffmpeg8-drop-postprocess.diff contains drop of postprocess library where
>    it is hardcoded and from WANTLIB because it was removed at ffmpeg8
>  - ffmpeg8-patches.diff patches which allows me to build ports against both,
>    ffmpeg6 (from ports) and ffmpeg8 (from a diff)
> 
> I've attached all of them as gzip.
> 
> The bulk with only ffmpeg8-patches.diff ended as:
> 
> Elapsed time=1 day 19:31:15
> I=12146 B=0 Q=0 T=0 F=0 !=109
> L=textproc/xmlwf www/tuba
> 
> where:
>  - textproc/xmlwf fails due to undefined symbol: XML_SetAlloc...
>  - www/tuba fails due to duplicating `BreakpointCondition' instance...
> 
> both aren't related to ffmpeg.
> 

I'd like to move on. Here the first diff which I would like to commit which
is attached as .gz because it is huge.

This diff brings patches which are requries to pass bulk build against
ffmpeg8.

I don't include update for ffmpeg8 or cleanup WANLIB and requried revbump.
Just patches.

My bulk is running and should be done in a day.

Ok to commit when it finished?

-- 
wbr, Kirill