On Sat, Nov 01, 2025 at 01:32:03PM -0700, Jeremy Evans wrote:
> Per our standard Ruby support policy, I am planning to remove Ruby 3.2
> from the ports tree, as it will be completely unsupported before the
> release of OpenBSD 7.9. Nothing currently depends on it, so
> this should cause no problems.
>  
> Here's the diff for ruby.port.mk. I also have diffs prepared for
> ruby-module.5 and quirks.
>  
> Thanks,
> Jeremy
> 
> Index: ruby.port.mk
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/ruby/ruby.port.mk,v
> diff -u -p -u -p -r1.124 ruby.port.mk
> --- ruby.port.mk	28 Jun 2025 00:36:08 -0000	1.124
> +++ ruby.port.mk	1 Nov 2025 20:28:02 -0000
> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ MODRUBY_HANDLE_FLAVORS ?= No
>  # If ruby.pork.mk should handle FLAVORs, define a separate FLAVOR
>  # for each ruby version.
>  .    if !defined(FLAVORS)
> -FLAVORS=	ruby32 ruby33 ruby34
> +FLAVORS=	ruby33 ruby34
>  .    endif
>  
>  # Instead of adding flavors to the end of the package name, we use
> @@ -49,11 +49,10 @@ FLAVOR =		ruby34
>  
>  # Check for conflicting FLAVORs and set MODRUBY_REV appropriately based
>  # on the FLAVOR.
> -.    for i in ruby32 ruby33 ruby34
> +.    for i in ruby33 ruby34
>  .      if ${FLAVOR:M$i}
>  MODRUBY_REV = ${i:C/ruby([0-9])/\1./}
> -.        if ${FLAVOR:N$i:Mruby32} || \
> -            ${FLAVOR:N$i:Mruby33} || \
> +.        if ${FLAVOR:N$i:Mruby33} || \
>              ${FLAVOR:N$i:Mruby34}
>  ERRORS += "Fatal: Conflicting flavors used: ${FLAVOR}"
>  .        endif
> @@ -153,7 +152,7 @@ SITES?=		${SITE_RUBYGEMS}
>  EXTRACT_SUFX=	.gem
>  
>  .  if ${CONFIGURE_STYLE:L:Mext}
> -# Use ports-gcc for ruby32 extensions if base does not use clang
> +# Use ports-gcc for extensions if base does not use clang
>  COMPILER ?= 	base-clang ports-gcc
>  COMPILER_LANGS ?= c
>  # Add build complete file to package so rubygems doesn't complain
> 
> 
I think I would remove the SUBDIRS proper before removing the
infrastructure support.