On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 07:54:17PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 05:59:09PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 05:26:59PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > > gcc15 does not like implicit int. These ports fail because the configure
> > > scripts think 'main()' is good enough.
> > > 
> > > Fixing this is trivial and we already patch up most of those scripts for
> > > other reasons.
> > > 
> > > This is just the tip of the Wimplicit-int iceberg but this is a start.
> > 
> > I'd be inclined to do this to make it a bit more resilient against the
> > next warning that a compiler person turns into a hard error:
> > 
> > -main()
> > +int main(void)
>  
> Sure I can do that, but we probably need to adjust a bit more then.
> Let me see...

Maybe I expressed myself poorly. I didn't want to suggest you eliminate
all warnings, but the trivial modification of adding "void" to your
patches would eliminate a -Wdeprecated-non-prototype warning.