this would unbreak security/wfuzz as well.
On the other hand, wfuzz seems to have been stale for some years, maybe
it's time to say goodbye?

one way or the other?
Sebastian


On Tue, Nov 4, 2025 at 7:26 PM Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org> wrote:

> same drill as the various py-standard-* recently imported, this is to
> replace cgi and cgitb, and will need to be left unhooked until the switch.
> needed for www/trac, maybe others.
>
> ok?
>

• wfuzz.patch (569B)