Index | Thread | Search

From:
Joerg Jung <mail@umaxx.net>
Subject:
Re: khal should not depend on vdirsyncer
To:
Marcus MERIGHI <mcmer-openbsd@tor.at>
Cc:
ports@openbsd.org
Date:
Wed, 17 Dec 2025 10:32:47 +0100

Download raw body.

Thread
> On 14. Dec 2025, at 15:46, Marcus MERIGHI <mcmer-openbsd@tor.at> wrote:
> 
> Hello, 
> 
> this is a friendly weekly ping...

This is fine with me.

> mcmer-openbsd@tor.at (Marcus MERIGHI), 2025.12.06 (Sat) 18:58 (CET):
>> Hello, 
>> 
>> one can use khal/ikhal with just local calender files.
>> syncing with caldav via vdirsyncer is nice, but optional. 
>> 
>> Therefore:
>> 
>> Index: Makefile
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /cvs/ports/productivity/khal/Makefile,v
>> retrieving revision 1.25
>> diff -u -p -u -r1.25 Makefile
>> --- Makefile    21 May 2025 12:12:32 -0000      1.25
>> +++ Makefile    6 Dec 2025 16:55:16 -0000
>> @@ -28,8 +28,7 @@ RUN_DEPENDS =         devel/py-atomicwrites \
>>                        devel/py-tz \
>>                        devel/py-tzlocal \
>>                        devel/py-urwid \
>> -                       devel/py-xdg \
>> -                       productivity/vdirsyncer
>> +                       devel/py-xdg
>> TEST_DEPENDS =         devel/py-hypothesis \
>>                        devel/py-freezegun \
>>                        sysutils/py-packaging
>