Download raw body.
khal should not depend on vdirsyncer
> On 14. Dec 2025, at 15:46, Marcus MERIGHI <mcmer-openbsd@tor.at> wrote: > > Hello, > > this is a friendly weekly ping... This is fine with me. > mcmer-openbsd@tor.at (Marcus MERIGHI), 2025.12.06 (Sat) 18:58 (CET): >> Hello, >> >> one can use khal/ikhal with just local calender files. >> syncing with caldav via vdirsyncer is nice, but optional. >> >> Therefore: >> >> Index: Makefile >> =================================================================== >> RCS file: /cvs/ports/productivity/khal/Makefile,v >> retrieving revision 1.25 >> diff -u -p -u -r1.25 Makefile >> --- Makefile 21 May 2025 12:12:32 -0000 1.25 >> +++ Makefile 6 Dec 2025 16:55:16 -0000 >> @@ -28,8 +28,7 @@ RUN_DEPENDS = devel/py-atomicwrites \ >> devel/py-tz \ >> devel/py-tzlocal \ >> devel/py-urwid \ >> - devel/py-xdg \ >> - productivity/vdirsyncer >> + devel/py-xdg >> TEST_DEPENDS = devel/py-hypothesis \ >> devel/py-freezegun \ >> sysutils/py-packaging >
khal should not depend on vdirsyncer