Index | Thread | Search

From:
Thomas Kupper <mailing.list@kupper.li>
Subject:
Re: Chrony 4.8 for ports
To:
Morgan Aldridge <morgant@makkintosshu.com>
Cc:
ports@openbsd.org
Date:
Sat, 17 Jan 2026 18:55:53 +0000

Download raw body.

Thread
On 17.01.2026 16:15, Morgan Aldridge wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2026 at 08:16 Mailing Lists <mailing.list@kupper.li 
> <mailto:mailing.list@kupper.li>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi,
> 
>     Based on Shaun Ren's GH OpenBSD code
>     (https://github.com/shaunren/chrony <https://github.com/shaunren/
>     chrony>) I have created a ports package/git
>     for Chrony 4.8.
> 
>     There are a few questions that came up.
> 
>     Regarding Chrony's source code:
> 
>     First off, the author - Shaun Ren - is for me just a name on a Github
>     profile, no email or anything else. On www.mail-archive.com <http://
>     www.mail-archive.com> there is a
>     Shaun Ren with entries from almost ten years ago on the linux-kernel
>     mailing list with a @linux.com <http://linux.com> address. I opened
>     an issue on GH 10 days
>     ago informing him/her that I did create the port and asked a) if it is
>     ok and b) if yes, if Shaun would add the copyright to all the files
>     that
>     where modified.
> 
>     What are the rules regarding the copyright of code and contact data
>     needed from a code owner? Shaun added a copyright to the file
>     sys_openbsd.c dating back to 2021 but not to now other file modified.
> 
> 
> The project's COPYING file declares the license of the project to be GPLv2:
> 
> <https://github.com/shaunren/chrony/blob/openbsd/COPYING <https:// 
> github.com/shaunren/chrony/blob/openbsd/COPYING>>
> 
> While `sys_openbsd.c` has an added copyright, it didn't change or remove 
> the GPLv2 license comment in that file:
> 
> <https://github.com/shaunren/chrony/blob/openbsd/sys_openbsd.c <https:// 
> github.com/shaunren/chrony/blob/openbsd/sys_openbsd.c>>
> 
> I'm no lawyer, but that doesn't appear to change the license and 
> distributability.

Not being a laywer, I hope that is the case.

And how is it handled that the author is just a name, so not verifiable 
nor reachable if no answer on GH should be given?

> Morgan

/Thomas