Index | Thread | Search

From:
Theo Buehler <tb@theobuehler.org>
Subject:
Re: Boost 1.89
To:
ports@openbsd.org, brad@openbsd.org, rsadowski@openbsd.org, gonzalo@openbsd.org, robert@openbsd.org
Date:
Fri, 6 Feb 2026 17:56:22 +0100

Download raw body.

Thread
  • Theo Buehler:

    Boost 1.89

    • Josh Grosse:

      Boost 1.89

      • Theo Buehler:

        Boost 1.89

On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 10:50:38AM -0500, Josh Grosse wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 01:26:55PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote:
> > ...
> > The following ports fail to build due to configure checks for
> > Boost::System. I'd appreciate if the maintainers could take care of
> > fixing this.
> > ...
> > 
> > Josh:		codeblocks
> > 	Fails to configure due to missing boost_system*
> 
> Attached is a diff for devel/codeblocks to remove boost_system.
> 
> Tested on amd64.

Great, thanks.

>  BUILD_DEPENDS=	archivers/zip
>  
>  LIB_DEPENDS=	archivers/bzip2 \
> -		devel/boost \

[...]

> + m4_include([m4/ax_boost_base.m4])
> +-m4_include([m4/ax_boost_system.m4])

I think we still need to keep a bdep on devel/boost? Boost is still
detected at configure time:

checking for boostlib >=  (102000)... yes

and and even if it's no longer contributing to wantlib, I suspect its
.hpp parts are picked up from some of the modules. Or did you check
that this doesn't happen?