Download raw body.
devel/ruby-ffi failure on arm64 BTI
On 2026/03/23 19:39, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> 22.03.2026 22:23, Stuart Henderson пишет:
> > On 2026/03/22 15:51, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> >> # pkg_add ruby34-ffi
> >> $ ktrace -di ruby34 /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/3.4/gems/ffi-1.17.2/samples/getpid.rb
> >> [ big dump of loaded files ]
> >> Illegal instruction (core dumped)
> >>
> >> $ kdump | grep BTCFI
> >> 88448 ruby34 PSIG SIGILL caught handler=0x221c893fcc mask=0<> code=ILL_BTCFI addr=0x22b6114000 trapno=905969665
> > ...
> >> Even with USE_NOBTCFI-aarch64=Yes in lang/ruby/3.4 (as well as devel/ruby-ffi
> >> and devel/libffi for good measure) it still fails.
> >
> > does it make it into the binary? objdump -p | grep OPENBSD
> > (compare with e.g. python3).
>
> No, but now it does and Ruby no longer dies, getpid.rb and openfact work!
>
> OPENBSD_NOBTCFI off 0x0000000000000000 vaddr 0x0000000000000000 paddr 0x0000000000000000 align 2**0
>
> Remains to see why Ruby is special while ffi-getpid.c works fine with BTI/PAC.
>
>
>
> So I only checked like this:
>
> $ make show=USE_NOBTCFI
> Yes
>
> But this is where it fails already:
>
> $ make show=_LINKER_FLAGS
> -z wxneeded
>
> Going over bsd.port.mk code, it really baffled me, until double checked
> my Makefile changes:
>
> $ head -n1 Makefile
> USE_NOBTCFI-aarch64 = Yes # devel/libffi
> $ make show=USE_NOBTCFI-aarch64
> Yes
> $ make show=USE_NOBTCFI-aarch64 | hexdump -C
> 00000000 59 65 73 09 0a |Yes..|
> 00000005
>
> That delimiting tab is consumed into the variable's value, hence why
> make's ${USE_NOBTCFI:L} == "yes" never matched...
>
> We do this all over at least for SHARED_LIBS, but apparently these
> variables/values are handled in a way that doesn't have this problem.
>
ha yes. that is a common gotcha for yes/no variables. it's possible to
have a looser match with :L:Myes, but I worry that it might be a bit too
loose sometimes then..
(
devel/ruby-ffi failure on arm64 BTI