Hello ports@,

there is a new release of luaunbound, which I'm currently testing in my
Prosody and is working fine. The main points of the release are a new
method to the exported object and better error reporting.

I did build and package all the FLAVORs, but I'm only testing the lua54
one as that's what Prosody uses. Should we keep all the FLAVORs? I don't
know how much churn is to remove FLAVORs, and it's a single, short C
file build, which is a negligible amount of time in bulks (probably).

OK?

	Lucas


diff refs/heads/master refs/heads/luaunbound
commit - 8602cdae67119bb3b1e4d93951f85606cc0ead96
commit + 1b0faa2f60ac96b1113b2f283428e0e0091ade3c
blob - a738b7684fe1908d1f9a527b2b2167e71c24fac8
blob + 381c9a14f50b3d3d62d02352696082798ddfa33c
--- net/luaunbound/Makefile
+++ net/luaunbound/Makefile
@@ -1,13 +1,12 @@
 COMMENT =	Lua bindings for libunbound
 
-DISTNAME =	luaunbound-1.0.0
-REVISION =	1
+DISTNAME =	luaunbound-1.1.0
 
 CATEGORIES =	net
 
 HOMEPAGE =	https://www.zash.se/luaunbound.html
 
-MAINTAINER =	Lucas <lucas@sexy.is>
+MAINTAINER =	Lucas Gabriel Vuotto <lucas@sexy.is>
 
 # MIT
 PERMIT_PACKAGE =	Yes
blob - 04d527bb95b51f6e833625f2c14dc3e94a13bf5f
blob + 956e0121382a8de0bc1facca6ee4f5b5284b2561
--- net/luaunbound/distinfo
+++ net/luaunbound/distinfo
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-SHA256 (luaunbound-1.0.0.tar.gz) = beRapkwhzw7LzLc0t8HtqIc6YTW74UL781P3cqkHUNM=
-SIZE (luaunbound-1.0.0.tar.gz) = 6366
+SHA256 (luaunbound-1.1.0.tar.gz) = I2FZRh7MYdTMfTc4p63PNoC6b2Hqbh+OGPLJteOpAkQ=
+SIZE (luaunbound-1.1.0.tar.gz) = 7438
blob - 863686d6e871eb2cbb45d44230d17f17835db993
blob + 3712bfdd7ec1cd825190c7b01533463b526f737a
--- net/luaunbound/pkg/PLIST
+++ net/luaunbound/pkg/PLIST
@@ -1 +1 @@
-lib/lua/${MODLUA_VERSION}/lunbound.so
+@so lib/lua/${MODLUA_VERSION}/lunbound.so