On Fri, 3 Jul 2026, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:

> On Wed, 01 Jul 2026 21:05:01 +0200,
> Daniel Dickman <didickman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > > 
> > > > (3) devel/swival -- Coding agent for doing security audits
> > > > 
> > 
> > > Potentially ok but need time to think
> > 
> > 
> > Very much appreciate your help, let me know if you spot any more issues 
> > for swival. I'm hoping we can import it soonish.
> > 
> 
> After some thought we're facing a trade off: py-flask-appbuilder to swival,
> right?
> 
> I see that py-flask-appbuilder needs py-flask-limiter version 3 already.
> 
> I don't use py-flask-appbuilder, but it is your port, and I think as a kind
> of workaround is add legacy py-flask-limiter for py-flask-appbuilder with
> conflict. Or yes, just mark it broken.
> 
> From user's point of view I think to have swival is better than py-flask-appbuilder


Yep, I agree.

Is that an ok to import swival and the ports it needs?