Index | Thread | Search

From:
Filip Lax <filip.lax@outlook.com>
Subject:
Re: Turnserver pending many security fixes
To:
"ports@openbsd.org" <ports@openbsd.org>
Date:
Sat, 15 Aug 2026 15:02:49 +0000

Download raw body.

Thread
Sorry I dont respond fast, and thanks alot for all help.

I make a copy of default CoTurn ports directory (4.9.0-r0) and put whole patch (your newest to 4.16.0-r0) in a file in main directory, Then run "patch -p0 < coturn.patch" and get:

......
Patching file patches/patch-src_apps_relay_mainrelay_c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1.
Hunk #2 failed at 12.
1 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to patches/patch-src_apps_relay_mainrelay_c.rej
......

All rest files in patch succeed. Sorry I dont understand how I can fix it. I attach to the mail the ".rej" file if it helps.

________________________________________
From: Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2026 8:51 AM
To: Filip Lax; ports@openbsd.org; Martijn van Duren
Subject: Re: Turnserver pending many security fixes

On 2026/07/29 17:45, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2026/07/29 14:48, Filip Lax wrote:
> > Hi I run CoTurn (which for Openbsd is called Turnserver) and found that from Openbsd port version to current latest version there is alot of security patches.
> >
> > CoTurn is 99,9% used as internet facing app, TURN and STUN utility to assist bridging peer2peer users, and so it is in an exposed position.
> >
> > Sadly I dont have the profficiency to update a port myself so I try to ask here for help from the port author.
>
> you could try this. I'm not running this software so not tested beyond
> build and "make test". (CC'ing martijn@ who looked at updates to this before..)
>
> (FWIW, last time I looked at this stuff, restund seemed slightly saner
> than coturn..)

...and here's a newer version.