On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 06:57:31PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:

Hello Ingo,

> Documentation having a size of 35 MB is certainly not good, and on first
> sight, this particular documentation doesn't appear to be well-organized,
> but it does look like it contains a lot of information, so if you are
> willing to search your way through it, it is probably worth having.
> Again, poor and messy documentation is better than none at all.

Point taken! Update attached.

> Provided that a port is useful and maintainable, which i cannot judge in
> this case - is it abandonware?  maybe even dangerous abandonware?  or
> does it just work and needs little maintenance? -

It works, and probably will continue doing so indefinitely: in one sense
it's quite simple (though not the maths...) and just works. That said, the
author has said there is a new version in the pipes, though I don't think
there's any sort of ETA.


Laurie

• drc2.tgz (3K)