Index | Thread | Search

From:
David Uhden Collado <daviduhden@gmail.com>
Subject:
Re: [NEW] editors/msedit
To:
anthony@anjbe.name
Cc:
ports@openbsd.org
Date:
Fri, 11 Sep 2026 18:46:00 +0000

Download raw body.

Thread
Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
> David Uhden Collado <daviduhden@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I removed --locked from MODCARGO_BUILD_ARGS and from the test
>> invocation. MODCARGO already vendors the dependency set and builds
>> offline, so there was no good reason to add it explicitly.
>>
>> I also changed ICU from RUN_DEPENDS to LIB_DEPENDS and added the
>> dynamically loaded ICU libraries to WANTLIB, with a comment noting that
>> they are loaded through dlopen. The EDIT_CFG_ICU*_SONAME settings remain
>> necessary because upstream opens those libraries explicitly at runtime.
>>
>> I removed ONLY_FOR_ARCHS as well. amd64 and arm64 were simply the two
>> architectures I had tested, which was not sufficient justification for
>> restricting the port. There does not appear to be an upstream
>> requirement limiting Edit to those architectures.
>>
>> The updated port builds successfully, and the complete test suite also
>> completes successfully:
> 
> The contents of the tarball you sent are identical to the previous one.
> 
> Since you agree with the changes, I went ahead and made them in my
> copy. I also removed the custom do-test target since the default
> tests work fine. The attached version is ok bentley@
Hi,

Sorry, I made a mistake while trying to fix this quickly and ended up
sending a tarball containing the same version of the port as before.

The changes I described in my previous email were in fact implemented;
I simply attached the wrong tarball.

I've attached the version I intended to send with the previous email.

Sorry for the confusion and inconvenience.

Thanks,
David.