lgtm, but reading the changelog, I am undecided whether it falls under

"Please limit ports commits to important changes.  Bug/security fixes,
updates required for the lifetime of -stable, that sort of thing."


On 9/27/26 6:39 AM, Brad Smith wrote:
> Here is an update to libuv 1.53.0.
> 
> Includes my patch for getexecpath() support.
> 
> Test suite looks good. Tested on aarch64.
> 
> 
> Index: Makefile
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/libuv/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.35
> diff -u -p -u -p -r1.35 Makefile
> --- Makefile	16 Sep 2026 16:32:16 -0000	1.35
> +++ Makefile	26 Sep 2026 23:26:38 -0000
> @@ -1,12 +1,11 @@
>   COMMENT =	multi-platform library for asynchronous I/O
>   
> -VER =		1.52.1
> +VER =		1.53.0
>   DISTNAME =	libuv-v${VER}
>   PKGNAME =	libuv-${VER}
>   CATEGORIES =	devel
> -REVISION =	0
>   
> -SHARED_LIBS +=  uv                   5.3      # 1.0
> +SHARED_LIBS +=  uv                   5.4      # 1.0
>   
>   HOMEPAGE =	https://libuv.org/
>   
> Index: distinfo
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/libuv/distinfo,v
> retrieving revision 1.14
> diff -u -p -u -p -r1.14 distinfo
> --- distinfo	8 Mar 2026 15:14:43 -0000	1.14
> +++ distinfo	26 Sep 2026 23:26:38 -0000
> @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
> -SHA256 (libuv-v1.52.1.tar.gz) = ZtURuebjNMDmInnrI0+/srMRCxR5wJuVtEx6/KjP+ec=
> -SIZE (libuv-v1.52.1.tar.gz) = 1354296
> +SHA256 (libuv-v1.53.0.tar.gz) = yw1t0hKNWpW9JCxsyYKiT+YI+pPaV7a07HY7ABjFPmQ=
> +SIZE (libuv-v1.53.0.tar.gz) = 1391596
> Index: patches/patch-src_unix_openbsd_c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: patches/patch-src_unix_openbsd_c
> diff -N patches/patch-src_unix_openbsd_c
> --- patches/patch-src_unix_openbsd_c	16 Sep 2026 16:32:20 -0000	1.6
> +++ /dev/null	1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
> @@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
> -Index: src/unix/openbsd.c
> ---- src/unix/openbsd.c.orig
> -+++ src/unix/openbsd.c
> -@@ -59,15 +59,17 @@ void uv_loadavg(double avg[3]) {
> -
> -
> - int uv_exepath(char* buffer, size_t* size) {
> -+
> -   if (buffer == NULL || size == NULL || *size == 0)
> -     return UV_EINVAL;
> -
> --  if (uv_saved_argv0 == NULL)
> --    return UV_EINVAL;
> -+  if (getexecpath(buffer, *size) == -1)
> -+    return UV__ERR(errno);
> -
> --  return uv__search_path(uv_saved_argv0, buffer, size);
> --}
> -+  *size = strlen(buffer);
> -
> -+  return 0;
> -+}
> -
> - uint64_t uv_get_free_memory(void) {
> -   struct uvmexp info;
> Index: patches/patch-test_test-get-currentexe_c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: patches/patch-test_test-get-currentexe_c
> diff -N patches/patch-test_test-get-currentexe_c
> --- patches/patch-test_test-get-currentexe_c	16 Sep 2026 16:32:20 -0000	1.1
> +++ /dev/null	1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
> @@ -1,33 +0,0 @@
> -On OpenBSD we expect an error instead of a silently truncated result in
> -all cases in which the buffer size is too small to hold the path.
> -
> -Index: test/test-get-currentexe.c
> ---- test/test-get-currentexe.c.orig
> -+++ test/test-get-currentexe.c
> -@@ -75,18 +75,26 @@ TEST_IMPL(get_currentexe) {
> -
> -   size = 1;
> -   r = uv_exepath(buffer, &size);
> -+#ifndef __OpenBSD__
> -   ASSERT_OK(r);
> -   ASSERT_OK(size);
> -   ASSERT_EQ(buffer[0], '\0');
> -+#else
> -+  ASSERT(r);
> -+#endif
> -
> -   memset(buffer, -1, sizeof(buffer));
> -
> -   size = 2;
> -   r = uv_exepath(buffer, &size);
> -+#ifndef __OpenBSD__
> -   ASSERT_OK(r);
> -   ASSERT_EQ(1, size);
> -   ASSERT_NE(buffer[0], '\0');
> -   ASSERT_EQ(buffer[1], '\0');
> -+#else
> -+  ASSERT(r);
> -+#endif
> -
> -   /* Verify uv_exepath is not affected by uv_set_process_title(). */
> -   r = uv_set_process_title("foobar");