Index | Thread | Search

From:
Jeremie Courreges-Anglas <jca@wxcvbn.org>
Subject:
Re: gnupg 2.5.24 vs notmuch [Re: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports]
To:
ports@openbsd.org
Date:
Sun, 27 Sep 2026 20:00:31 +0200

Download raw body.

Thread
On Sat, Sep 26, 2026 at 01:00:46PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2026/09/23 13:43, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> > CVSROOT:	/cvs
> > Module name:	ports
> > Changes by:	jca@cvs.openbsd.org	2026/09/23 13:43:54
> > 
> > Modified files:
> > 	security/gnupg : Makefile distinfo 
> > 
> > Log message:
> > Update to gnupg-2.5.24
> > 
> 
> This breaks a configure test in mail/notmuch which tries to extract
> a session key using gmime. I've had trouble with this in the past due
> to a libgcrypt issue on i386, so I have a test case handy, shell script
> attached. Any ideas? Nothing from https://dev.gnupg.org/T8425.html
> jumps out at me as being particularly likely to be involved.

I have reverted to 2.5.22(+EPOCH) since it's not clear how wide the
breakage is.  I'm not sure there will be a gnupg-2.5.26 bugfix release
before OpenBSD 8.0 so I'm playing it safe for now.  Issue already
reported upstream by wiz@NetBSD:

  https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2026-September/036466.html

I've added some input but my mail is currently blocked by greylisting.

> (retrying with the reproducer script gzipped, majordomo didn't like me
> sending it directly).

Thx for the script, it helped, and thanks for the heads-up!

-- 
jca