Lucas de Sena writes:
> > 2 only makes sense if prboom-plus provides something the other Doom
> > ports don't. Does it? If not, my inclination is to delete prboom-plus,
> > delete prboom (unless it too provides something unique), keep dsda-doom,
> > and maybe port prboomx.
> > 
>
> No, DSDA-Doom features everything prboom did before the repository
> getting archived.  And even included support for [UMAPINFO] by default,
> which, on prboom+, was kept on a separate branch until v2.5.1.5, which
> our ported version predates.

Barring objection, ok bentley@ to remove prboom and prboom-plus.