From: Renaud Allard Subject: Re: [new] net/dnsq To: ports Cc: Otto Moerbeek Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 09:30:02 +0100 On 2/20/24 09:17, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 09:09:49AM +0100, Renaud Allard wrote: > >> >> >> On 2/19/24 16:50, Renaud Allard wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Here is a preliminary port for "q" which is a tiny and feature-rich >>> command line DNS client with support for UDP, TCP, DoT, DoH, DoQ, and >>> ODoH. >>> >> >> Here is the port cleaned up. There is no man page (although you can get >> usage with --help), so I included the readme.md in /usr/local/share/doc/q >> >> Any suggestions or OKs? > > I occasiaonally use it, so a port is welcome. I do have one gripe: the > name, it's way too short and thus non-descriptive. dnsq or anything > more descriptive would be better. > Yes, the name doesn't tell anything by itself. Is this one better? The binary is still called q, but the package is dnsq.