From: Stuart Henderson <stu@spacehopper.org>
Subject: Re: missing endbr64
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Theo Buehler <tb@theobuehler.org>, ports@openbsd.org
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 18:43:54 +0000

> > sysutils/borgbackup/2.0.log: lots of warnings about symbols from openssl/3.1:
> > ld: warning: aesni_set_decrypt_key: missing endbr64
> > ld: warning: aesni_set_encrypt_key: missing endbr64
> > ld: warning: ChaCha20_ctr32: missing endbr64
> > ld: warning: bn_mul_mont: missing endbr64
> > ld: warning: bn_mul_mont_gather5: missing endbr64
> > ld: warning: bn_power5: missing endbr64
> > ld: warning: bn_get_bits5: missing endbr64
> > ld: warning: bn_scatter5: missing endbr64
> > ld: warning: bn_gather5: missing endbr64
> > ld: warning: rsaz_1024_sqr_avx2: missing endbr64
> > ld: warning: rsaz_1024_mul_avx2: missing endbr64
> > etc
> 
> WTF, so this links against the static version of the lib in order to
> be able to call non-public functions?  USE_NOBTCFI and laugh at them?

Links against the static version to try and avoid symbol conflicts
with libressl libs (which python is linked against).