From: Stuart Henderson Subject: Re: UPDATE: textproc/latexmk To: danterobinson@tuta.io Cc: Ports Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 10:12:01 +0100 On 2024/06/14 02:15, danterobinson@tuta.io wrote: > Please let me know if this is the right format to use when sending > in a patch, thank you! It's mangled - tabs have been replaced by spaces. Some web-based mail clients make it quite difficult or sometimes impossible to cleanly include a patch. You might hace better luck saving the diff to a file and including as an attachment. That is not the preferred format (inline plaintext diff direct in an email) but it's better than mangled diffs. Other comments: > --- Makefile.old Thu Jun 13 20:07:35 2024 > +++ Makefile Thu Jun 13 10:50:35 2024 Would be better to use "cvs diff" (if you fetched your ports tree via cvs) or "git diff" (if using the experimental git mirror). > @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ > COMMENT= LaTeX documents output generation automation tool > > -DISTNAME= latexmk-452c > +DISTNAME= latexmk-485 > EXTRACT_SUFX= .zip > REVISION= 0 REVISION should be removed on version updates. > -HOMEPAGE= http://www.phys.psu.edu/~collins/software/latexmk-jcc/ > +HOMEPAGE= http://www.cantab.net/users/johncollins/latexmk/ That can use https. The patch should be regenerated too. Use "make patch" and then "make update-patches".