From: Paul Galbraith Subject: Re: [NEW] net/b2 To: Stuart Henderson , Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda Cc: A Tammy , ports@openbsd.org Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 16:24:00 -0400 On 2024-07-30 6:37 a.m., Stuart Henderson wrote: > Underscore's not so good. Make it easy to type and maybe > tab-completable from the original name. People can always alias or > symlink into ~/bin or something if they want the original name. > > -- >   Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting. > > > On 29 July 2024 22:34:48 Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda > wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 3:27 PM Paul Galbraith >> wrote: >> >> On 2024-07-29 5:21 p.m., Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 3:04 PM Kirill A. Korinsky >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 22:21:22 +0200, >>> Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote: >>> > >>> > I'd be OK if we rename b2 in this port to something else... >>> > >>> > In debian they seem to rename the binary b2 -> >>> backblaze-b2, according to: >>> > >>> > https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/all/backblaze-b2/filelist >>> > >>> > So, maybe a lot of people don't depend on that name on >>> their scripts... >>> > >>> > Thoughts? >>> >>> Backblaze suggest to use b2v3 or b2v4 inside scripts [1]. I >>> think that >>> rename file and add Readme where explain why it has been >>> renamed should be ok. >>> >>> Footnotes: >>> [1] >>> https://github.com/Backblaze/B2_Command_Line_Tool?tab=readme-ov-file#apiver-cli-versions-b2-vs-b2v3-b2v4-etc >>> >>> >>> Then maybe we need the following?: >>> >>> b2 -> backblaze-b2 >>> b2v3 -> backblaze-b2v3 >>> b2v4 -> backblaze-b2v4 >>> >>> Referred docs still tell you to use `b2` straight: "if you want >>> the latest bells and whistles..." >>> >>> I wonder why debian isn't providing the *v3, and *v4 binaries, >>> maybe they provide an older backblaze-b2 before that naming... >>> >> This is what I'm planning to do.  Debian's port is old (1.3.8 for >> bookworm, 3.1.x for unstable) and I think pre-dates the v3/v4 >> distinction. >> >> >> Yes, debian sid (unstable) provides: >> >> /usr/bin/_b2v4 >> /usr/bin/b2v3 >> /usr/bin/backblaze-b2 >> >> https://packages.debian.org/sid/all/backblaze-b2/filelist >> >> Don't know what I feel about the underscore one, though... > This is what I have been using now, it seems ok to me: