From: Theo Buehler <tb@theobuehler.org>
Subject: Re: pycryptodomex
To: ports <ports@openbsd.org>, Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse <j@jasper.la>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 06:10:43 +0200

On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 12:24:02AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Rather than patching ports for cryptodomex vs cryptodome (which are
> basically the same but under a different namespace) I think it would
> make sense to import cryptodomex as a separate port.

The !${PROPERTIES:Mclang} stanza is no longer needed since sparc64 now
accepts C99 things by default. Would be nice to get rid of all these...
py-cryptodome doesn't need it either.

With that removed, ok